BhaiTard- Sale kutte, I was just giving my opinion and you slapped me. Now you will be in jail.
Rational- But I gave athanni to beggar, remember?
BhaiTard- Saale kutte, you are Shahrukh gay’s fan and you hate Bhai for no reason and Bhai tum sab pe bhari hai, I dont talk to haters.
BhaiTard wins debate with logic.
^^ this is the logic being given around^^
Salman Khan got a bail because Harish Salve didnt get a copy of the judgement because there was no electricity (apparently ) .
Clearly judiciary is sold out in India
This brings me to the case of undertrial prisoners in India.
A prisoner on remand is someone who is imprisoned before the start of his trial. He is desperately poor and cannot afford a lawyer, bond or bail.
Because the prisoner has not been formally tried, he is presumed to be innocent under the principles of natural justice . He is entitled to special benefits and treatment that are not offered to regular prisoners.
Being on remand can be stressful and emotionally distressing, if a prisoner is innocent . Why should he suffer because the judiciary is too slow in India?
When a case does NOT warrant a term in jail , why put the man in remand prison . The police must be punished if they slap unwarranted IPC sections , just to keep the man in prison , so that they can get promotions.
Even lawyers struggle to convict a man— so that he can add that as a feather on his cap. He will often boast about it – for putting innocent men in prison ? These are the people who become judges later.
More than 1/3 of the people remanded in prison went on to receive a sentence that wasn’t prison in India over the past decade. Then why put him in remand prison –just because he cannot afford bail ? Different rules for poor and the rich ?
87% of prisoners in Bihar’s prisons are on remand awaiting trial. A lot of prisoners are very old over the age of 70.
The police take months to file charges, lawyers delay filing cases , judges are absent leading to frequent adjournments and the accused are not produced in time, as there were no vans . Most of Bihar’s 55 jails, for example, simply do not have enough prison vans to transport prisoners to the courts.
The absence of witnesses and OBJECTIVE evidence impeded 20 % of hearings. Innocent remand prisoners are often released after wasting away their entire youth in jails.
Police love to show their smartness by slapping as many IPC sections as possible.(read below , how meaningless sections were applied in Bapuji’s case).The judges do NOT pull up the police and ask them to justify why unwarranted IPC sections are slapped for sadist reasons .
Every IPC section adds up.
When a judge is convinced that a poor man will have to go to remand prison just because he cannot afford the bail, or provide bond surety , why cant he be compassionate and just relax the terms ?
Sometimes this poor man has nobody to stand bond surety for him, the way the judge wants ( with originals of Aadhar card, ration card , salary certificate etc ).
A rich man will get anticipatory bail 100% even if the charge is non-bailable.
Now same things happened in Asharam Bapu’s case , useless sections were slapped
1. 120 – conspiracy – what or against whom , none knows
2. 506 – criminal intimidation – neither there is a proof of grievous hurt or bodily harm , in facts His disciples & ashram are being attacked regularly
- 509- word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman – If this was the case how come majority of the women discples are still with him ?
– Indian Express
6.342-punishment for wrongful confinement – No arrest done till date from ashram regarding forcebly conining someone against their wish
7.354 A – molestation – not even a sratch found on the girls body
Apart from the bogus case , Asharam Bapu was denied bail even on medical grounds while people like Sanjay Dutt were out on parole for wife’s illness who was found partying
The trend started with Jayalalitha when on the eve of Deepavali in 2004, she arrested Kanchi Shankaracharya, Jayendra Saraawati Swamiji. She accused the Kanchi Acharya of every possible crime under the sun in the hope that at least one will stick in court and the Mutt will be forever defiled. Sonia smirked, ‘purpose served’. But the court acquitted him of all charges. Now, the AIADMK govt. has the guts to ban RSS Route Marches in the state, although the court had granted permission, but Islamic organizations and Dharvida Kazhakam are given a free hand to take out morchas and organise public rallies where they spew venom on Hindus.
For example, Swami Aseemanand, Sadhvi Pragya, Swami Amrutanand Dev Tirth (better known as Dayanand Pandey), Shankaracharya of Sarada Sarvigya peet,Dhananjay Desai are languishing in jail for many years without even a trial. On what basis Bails are denied to them? We can understand the intention of the UPA Govt. in arresting them -to prove Hindu Terror. But why the Modi Govt. follows the same policy? What is the harm in giving them bail? Now that we have a BJP Govt. in Maharashtra, can Hindus expect that these Hindu activists will get bail?
It is surprising that while many men accused of terror plot are getting bail easily, Hindu activists are in jail indefinitely without any charge sheet and trial.
Even after Salman Khan &
20 months in Jail without Conviction at 76 age